Huxley suggests that his readers should not assume that such progress can last forever, especially when it is allowed to usurp concerns about aspects of the human experience besides shallow happiness, like truth and beauty.
Universal happiness keeps the wheels steadily turning truth and beauty can’t.” Mond’s reminiscence on 20th-century technological progress is one of the most prophetic notes in the novel. In “Our Ford’s” time, Mond muses, “they seemed to have imagined that could be allowed to go on indefinitely, regardless of everything else. Because he knows science’s potential, though, he makes sure its ambitions remain limited, so that the World State’s achievement of stability can stand unchallenged. We don’t allow it to deal with any but the most immediate problems of the moment.” Mond doesn’t question the value of science he used to be an avid researcher himself. That’s why we so carefully limit the scope of its researches-that’s why I almost got to an island. He goes on to explain that, “We can’t allow science to undo its own good work. Every discovery in pure science is potentially subversive even science must sometimes be treated as a possible enemy.” In other words, technological changes risk undoing the World State’s carefully conditioned stability and making people recognize and resist their enslavement. That’s another reason why we’re so chary of applying new inventions. When Mustapha Mond explains to the Savage that even technological and scientific advances are suppressed for social reasons, he says, “Every change is a menace to stability. There is more to humanity that the mind’s ability to “judge and desire and decide,” and World State technology is unable to control that “something more” as effectively as it forms children’s likes and dislikes.īecause technology is limited in this way, the World State must control its advancement. While such conditioning is undeniably effective for keeping the World State running, the presence of figures like Bernard and Helmholtz-both of whom resist aspects of their conditioning and long for something more than what the World State says is permissible-shows that it’s not foolproof. That is, the use of conditioning like hypnopaedia falsely suggests that a human being can be reduced to the ethical maxims he or she is force-fed. Yet, at the same time, such technological control is inherently reductive. But all these suggestions are our suggestions!’ The Director almost shouted in his triumph.” Such a process is chilling, because the whispered suggestions actually give shape to a developing child’s thought processes and his or her perception of the world. The mind that judges and desires and decides-made up of these suggestions. During a student tour, the Director of the London Hatchery explains the process of hypnopaedia, when recordings asserting World State morality are played for sleeping children to subconsciously absorb: “‘Till at last the child’s mind is these suggestions, and the sum of the suggestions is the child’s mind. World State technology is undoubtedly effective in creating complacent citizens.
Huxley argues that the more human beings harness technology to guarantee human happiness, the more they will end up enslaved by technology, to the neglect of higher human aspirations. Once this happens, the novel suggests, the totalitarian government will cease to allow the pursuit of actual science, and the truth that science reveals will be restricted and controlled. Brave New World raises the terrifying prospect that advances in the sciences of biology and psychology could be transformed by a totalitarian government into technologies that will change the way that human beings think and act.
0 kommentar(er)
